ORSB – ANGOLA COUNTRY STRATEGY PAPER 2011 - 2015
% Disbursed versus relative age
80.0%
% disbursed
Agriculture
Social
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
Water and Sanitation
0.0%
-0.20
-20.0%
0.20
Multisector
0.60
1.00
1.40
Relative Age (to expected duration at appraisal)
Notes
(a) Bubble size = volume of commitments
(b) Relative age = time elapsed between date of effectiveness and estimated duration at appraisal. The
disbursement rates do not necessarily reflect implementation rates.
(c) Both the “Multisector“ and “Water and Sanitation” are comprised exclusively of one operation; one awaiting
effectiveness and the other the first disbursement .
2.2 The last CPPR for Angola was prepared in February 2008. It concluded with overall unsatisfactory portfolio
performance. The average rating was 1.75 (scale 0-3) given that one project was Problematic Project and two projects
were deemed potentially problematic
2.2.1. The situation remains sensibly the same; two projects were rated Problematic (Project Support of the
Demobilisation and Reintegration of Vulnerable groups and Health Services Rehabilitation Project) and one is Potential
Problematic (PAGEF), the proportion of Project at Risk (PAR) in the rated portfolio is 50%, which is higher than the 1030% range that is indicative of satisfactory portfolio performance. The supervision reports suggest that there has been a
better progress in Agriculture than in Social, Multisector and in the Water and Sanitation sectors.
6