Skip to main content
LibrarySign in
publishing the work or making copies thereof, provided the said materials are not fit except for re-publishing the work. As regards eurythmy, acting and conveying to the public, the court may order computation of the revenue resulting from publication or presentation and seizing it. These procedures shall be taken according to an order issued in response to a petition. The order may provide that the process server entrusted with execution be assisted by one or more experts, who shall obligate the petitioner to deposit an appropriate guarantee. These procedures shall not be subject to the provisions of the Civil Code of Procedures related to the hours of notification and holidays. The applicant must file the substance suit to the competent court within fifteen days following the issuance of the order, otherwise it will have no effect. Article(45) A person against whom an order was issued may protest against it to the president of the court which issued the order. The court president may in this case, after hearing the statements of the parties to the dispute, decide to support the order, cancel it in whole or in part, or appoint a trustee whose assignment shall be the re-publication, presentation or making copies of the work of art which is the subject of the dispute, provided that the resulting revenue shall be deposited in the court's safe, pending settlement of the cause of the dispute by the competent court. Article(46) The court before which the dispute is brought may, upon a petition filed by the author or his deputy, order destroying the copies or photocopies of a work of art which has been illegally published as well as the materials used in publishing the work, provided they are not fit for another work. The court may order to change the features of the copies, photocopies and the materials or make them unfit for use and all of this shall be at the expense of the responsible party. However, the court may, instead of ordering to destroy or change the features of the work, decide levying provisional seizure on the work in payment of the compensation decided to the author by the court. This shall be followed if the copyright in a work of art shall lapse within a period of less than two years from the date of the issuance of the court's decision, provided the copyrights stipulated for in Articles (5) paragraph one, (7) paragraph one and (9) shall not be violated. However, if the dispute is related to translation of a work of art into Arabic, in violation of the provisions of Article (8), the decision shall be limited to levying provisional

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents