Cambridge Plan AG v Moore 1987 (4) SA 821 (D)
274
Cowbell AG v ICS Holdings Ltd [2001] 4 All SA 242 (2001 (3) SA 941) (SCA)
277
Danco Clothing (Pty) Ltd v NuCare Marketing Sales and Promotions (Pty)
Ltd and another 1991 (4) SA 850 (A)
262
Federation Internationale de Football v Bartlett 1994 (4) SA 722 (T)
276
Glenton & Mitchell v French Tea & Coffee Works 1927 WLD 272
279
Goolam Ally Family Trust v Textife, Curtaining and Trimming
1989 (4) SA 985 (C)
268
Hollywood Curl (Ply) Ltd v Twins Products (Pty) Ltd (1) 1989 (1) SA 236 (A)
274
Juta & Co v De Koker and another 1994 (3) SA 499 (T)
283
Kohlberg v Burnett NO and others 1986 (3) SA 12 (A)
267
Laugh it Off Promotions CC v SA Breweries International [2004] 4 All SA
151 (SCA)
278
Luster Products Inc v Magic Style Sales CC [1997] 1 All SA 327
(1997 (3) SA 13) (A)
262
Mars Incorporated v Cadbury (Swaziland) (Pty) Ltd 2000 (4) SA 1010 (SCA)
273
McDonald's Corporation v Joburgers DriveInn Restaurant (Pty) Ltd;
McDonald's Corporation v Dax Props CC; McDonald's Corporation v
Joburgers DriveInn Restaurant (Pty) Ltd 1996] 4 All SA 1 (1997 (1) SA 1)
(A)
274
Metal Box South Africa Ltd v Midpak Blow Moulders (Pty) Ltd
1988 (2) SA 446 (T)
281
Moolla Group Ltd and others v The GAP and others [2005] 4 All SA 245
(SCA)
270
Peter Jackson (Overseas) Ltd v Rand Tobacco (1936) Ltd 1937 TPD 450
279
PlasconEvans Paints Ltd v Van Riebeeck Paints (Pty) Ltd 1984 (3) SA 623
(A)
262
Page 262 of [2006] 2 All SA 260 (T)
PPI Makelaars v PPS [1997] 4 All SA 444 (1998 (1) SA 595) (SCA)
279
Ritz Hotel Ltd v Charles of the Ritz Ltd and another 1988 (3) SA 290 (A)
264
SAFA v Stanton Woodrush (Pty) Ltd 2003 (3) SA 313 (SCA)
264
South African Football Association v Sandton Woodrush (Pty) Limited
2002 (2) SA 236 (T)
264
Sportshoe (Pty) Ltd v Pep Stores (SA) (Pty) Ltd 1990 (1) SA 722 (A)
275
Standard Bank of SA Ltd v United Bank Ltd 1991 (4) SA 780 (T)
278
Valentino Globe BV v Phillips and another [1998] 4 All SA 1
(1998 (3) SA 775) (SCA)
264
Zimbo Spares Co Pty Ltd t/a Motoquip v Car Quip CC and another,
unreported, case number: 24116/03 (T)
280
United Kingdom
Aktiebolaget Volvo v Heritage (LEIC) Ltd [2000] FSR 253 (ChD) 264
279
Judgment
VAN ROOYEN AJ
[1] This case involves an application to expunge from the register of trade marks a number of trade mark
registrations for the trade mark Shatterprufe, registered in a variety of c1asses. The relief sought by the
applicant inc1udes, alternatively, a declaratory order that its use of the term "shatterproof" (whether spelt
as one word or two) does not infringe any of those registered trade marks that are sought to be expunged.
[2] The respondents, in opposing the application, have instituted a counterapplication for an interdict in terms
of section 34(1) of the Trade Marks Act 194 of 1993 ("the Act") against the infringement of those trade marks