6. (1) Copies of the statement in support of an application for leave under rule 3 of this Order shall be served
with the notice of motion or summons and, subject to paragraph (2)of this rule, no grounds shall be relied upon
or any relief sought at the hearing except the grounds and relief set out in the statement.
(2) The Court may on the hearing of the motion or summons allow the applicant to amend his statement whether
by specifying different or additional grounds of relief or otherwise, on such terms, if any, as it thinks fit and may
allow further affidavits to be used if they deal with new matters arising out of an affidavit of any other party to
the application.
(3) Where the applicant intends to ask to be allowed to amend his statement or to use further affidavits, he shall
give notice of his intention and of any proposed amendment to every other party.
(4) Each party to the application shall supply every other party on demand, and on payment of the proper court
charges copies of every affidavit which he proposes to use at the hearing including in the case of the applicant,
the affidavit in support of the application for leave under rule 3 of this Order.
7. On an application for judicial review the Court may, subject to paragraph (2)of this Order, award damages to
the applicant if(a) he has included in the statement in support of his application for leave under rule 3 of this Order a claim for
damages arising from, any matter to which the application relates; and
(b) the Court is satisfied that if the claim had been made in an action begun by the applicant at the time of
making his application, he could have been awarded damages.
8. Unless the Court otherwise directs, any interlocutory application in proceedings on an application for judicial
review may be made to any judge notwithstanding that the application for judicial review has been made by
motion and is to be heard by the Court.
9. (1) On the hearing of any motion or summons under rule 5 of this Order, any person who desires to be heard
in opposition to the motion or summons, and appears to the Court to be a proper person to be heard, shall be
heard, notwithstanding that he has not been served with notice of the motion or the summons.
(2) Where the relief sought is or includes an order of certiorari to remove any proceedings for the purpose of
quashing them, the applicant may not question the validity of any order, warrant, commitment, conviction,
inquisition or record unless before the hearing of the motion or summons he has filed a copy thereof verified by
affidavit or accounts for his failure to do so to the satisfaction of the Court hearing the motion or summons.
(3) Where an order of certiorari is made in any such case as is referred to in paragraph (2) of this rule, the order
shall, subject to paragraph (4) of this rule, direct that the proceedings shall be quashed forthwith on their removal
into the court.
(4) Where the relief sought is an order of certiorari and the Court is satisfied that there are grounds for quashing
the decision to which the application relates, the Court may, in addition to quashing it, remit the matter to the
Court, tribunal authority concerned with a direction to reconsider it and reach a decision in accordance with the
findings of the Court.
(5) Where the relief sought is a declaration, an injunction or damages and the Court considers that it should not
be granted on an application for judicial review but might have been granted if it had been sought in an action
begun by writ by the applicant at the time of making his application, the Court may, instead of refusing the
application, order the proceedings to continue as if they had been begun by writ.
10. No action or proceeding shall be begun or prosecuted against any person in respect of anything done in
obedience to an order of mandamus.
11. Where there is more than one application pending against several persons in respect of the same matter, and
on and on the same grounds, the Court may order the applications to be consolidated.