19. If the party from whom discovery of any kind or inspection is sought objects to it or any part thereof, the
Court or a Judge in chambers may, if satisfied that the right to the discovery or inspection sought depends on the
determination of any issue or question in dispute in the action or that for any other reason it is desirable that any
issue or question in dispute in the action should be determined before deciding upon the right to the discovery or
inspection, order that that issue or question be determined first, and reserve the question as to the discovery or
inspection.
20. (1) If any party fails to comply with any order to answer interrogatories or for discovery or inspection of
documents, he shall be liable to committal.
(2) He shall, also, if a plaintiff, be liable to have his action dismissed for want of prosecution and if a defendant,
to have his defence, if any, struck out and to be placed in same position as if he had not defended and the party
interrogating may apply to the Court or a Judge in chambers for an order to that effect and an order may be made
accordingly.
21. (1) Service of an order for interrogatories or discovery or inspection made against any party or his legal
practitioner shall be sufficient service to found an application for an attachment for disobedience to the order.
(2) But the party against whom the application for attachment is made may show in answer to the application
that he has had no notice or knowledge of the order.
22. A legal practitioner upon whom an order against any party for interrogatories or discovery or inspection is
served under the last preceding rule, who neglects without reasonable excuses to give notice thereof to his client,
shall be liable to pay the costs occasioned thereby.
23. Any party may, at the trial of a cause, matter or issue, use in evidence any one or more of the answers or any
part of an answer of the opposite party to interrogatories without putting in the others or the whole of such
answer:
Provided always, that in such case the Judge may look at the whole of the answers and if he is of opinion that
any others of them are so connected with those put in, that those put in ought not to be used without them, he
may direct them to be put in.
24. In any action against or by a sheriff in respect of any matters connected with the execution of his office, the
Court or a Judge in chambers may, on the application of any party, order that the affidavit to be made in answer
either to interrogatories or to an order for discovery shall be made by the officer actually concerned.
25. This Order shall apply to infant plaintiffs and defendants and to their next friends and guardians ad litem.
26. Any Order made under the provisions of this Order (including an Order made on appeal) may on sufficient
cause being shown, be revoked or varied by a subsequent Order or direction of the Court or a Judge in chambers
made or given at or before trial.
Order 33
Interlocutory Injunctions and Interim Preservation of Property
1. (1) An application for the grant of an injunction may be made by any party to an action before or after the trial
of the action, whether or not a claim for injunction was included in that party's action.
(2) Where the applicant is the plaintiff and the case is one of urgency, the application for the grant of an
injunction may be made ex parte on affidavit but, except as aforesaid, the application shall be made by motion
on notice or summons.
(3) The plaintiff may not make an application for the $rant of an injunction before the issue of the process by
which the action is to be begun, except where the case is one of urgency and in that case, the injunction applied
for may be granted on terms providing for the issue of the process and such other terms, if any, as the Court
thinks fit.