Mars Inc v Cadbury (Swaziland) (Pty) Ltd and another [2000] JOL 7370
(2000 (4) SA 1010) (SCA)
220
Bograin SA's Trade Mark Application [2005] RPC 14
218
British Sugar plc v James Robertson & Sons Ltd [1996] RPC 281 (Ch)
220
CocaCola Trade Marks [1986] RPC 421 (HL)
219
Compagnie Generale Michelin v National Automobile, etc Workers Union
[1997] 2 FC 306
220
Dualit Ltd's (Toaster Shapes) Trade Mark Applications [1999] RPC 890
219
Interlego AG's Trade Mark Applications [1998] RPC 69
219
John Haig & Co Ltd v Forth Blending Co Ltd (1953) 70 RPC 259
222
Philips Electronics NV v Remington Consumer Products [1998] RPC 283
220
Procter & Gamble Ltd's Trade Mark Applications [1999] RPC 673 (CA)
219
SM Jaleel & Co Ltd's Trade Mark Application [2000] RPC 471
219
The Canadian Shredded Wheat Co Ltd v Kellogg Co of Canada Ltd (1938) 55
RPC 125 (PC)
223
Yakult's Application [2001] RPC 39
219
Criminal Proceedings against Karl Prantl ECJ case 16/83 of 13 March 1984
218
Eurocermex v OHIM (shape of a beer bottle) [2004] ECR II0000
220
Henkel KGaA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks
and Designs) (OHIM) joined cases C456/01P and C457/01P
219
Nestlé Waters France v OHIM case T305/02
220
VikingUmwelttechnik GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(trade marks and designs) (OHIM) Case T316/00
222
National Fittings v Oystertec [2005] SGHC 225
220
Canada
Europe
Singapore
Page 217 of [2006] 4 All SA 215 (SCA)
United States
In re Pacer Technology 338 F.3d 1348, 67 USPQ2d 1629 (Fed. Cir. 2003)
219
Seabrook Foods Inc. BarWell Foods Ltd 568 F.2d 1342, 1344 (CCPA 1977)
219
Tone Bros Inc v Sysco Corp 28 F.3d 1192, 1206 (Fed Cir 1994)
219
Two Pesos Inc v Taco Cabana Inc 505 US 763, 768 (1992)
219
WalMart Stores Inc v Samara Bros Inc 529 US 205, 210 (2000)
219
View Parallel Citation
Judgment
HARMS JA:
[1]
This appeal concerns a trade mark dispute relating to a wine bottle. The appellant sought to interdict the
respondent from infringing its
View Parallel Citation
registered trade mark for a container for alcoholic beverages (TM 1977/00647) and the respondent, in turn,
sought to have the mark expunged. Waglay AJ, in the Cape High Court, ordered the mark to be expunged
and, consequently, found it unnecessary to decide the infringement issue. The appeal is with his leave.