(3) Nothing contained in or done under the authority of any law shall be held to be
inconsistent with or in contravention of this section to the extent that the law in
question makes provision (a)
for the imposition of restrictions on the movement or residence within
Mauritius of any person in the interests of defence, public safety, public
order, public morality or public health;
(b)
for the imposition of restrictions on the right of any person to leave Mauritius
in the interests of defence, public safety, public order, public morality or,
public health or of securing compliance with any international obligation of
the Government, particulars of which have been laid before the Assembly;
(c)
for the imposition of restrictions, by order of a court, on the movement or
residence within Mauritius of any person either in consequence of his having
been found guilty of a criminal offence under the law of Mauritius or for the
purpose of ensuring that he appears before a court at a later date for trial in
respect of such a criminal offence or for proceedings preliminary to trial or
for proceedings relating to his extradition or other lawful removal from
Mauritius;
(d)
for the imposition of restrictions on the movement or residence within
Mauritius of any person who is not a citizen of Mauritius or the exclusion or
expulsion from Mauritius of any such person;
(e)
for the imposition of restrictions on the acquisition or use by any person of
land or other property in Mauritius;
(f)
for the removal of a person from Mauritius to be tried outside Mauritius for a
criminal offence or to undergo imprisonment outside Mauritius in execution
of the sentence of a court in respect of a criminal offence of which he has
been convicted; or
(g)
for the imposition of restrictions on the right of any person to leave Mauritius
in order to secure the fulfilment of any obligations imposed upon that person
by law,
except so far as that provision or, as the case may be, the thing done under its
authority is shown not to be reasonably justifiable in a democratic society.
(4)
Where any person whose freedom of movement has been restricted in pursuance
of subsection (3)(a) or (b) so requests (a)
he shall, as soon as is reasonably practicable and in any case not more
than 7 days after the making of the request, be furnished with a statement in
writing in a language that he understands, specifying the grounds for the
imposition of the restriction;
(b)
not more than 14 days after the making of the request, and thereafter during
the continuance of the restriction at intervals of not more than 6 months, his
case shall be reviewed by an independent and impartial tribunal consisting