Article 20: Any person who believes that his/her personal information has been unduly disclosed
can appeal to the Court of First Instance or the Magistrate’s Court in the jurisdiction of the
accused institution to stop their disclosure.
If the president of the jurisdiction considers that the official of the accused institution was right
to authorize disclosure, he can reject the appeal.
Article 21: The National Independent Human Rights Institution is equally competent, within the
framework of its mandate, to ensure the exercise and enjoyment of the right to information.
Chapter VI: Criminal Provisions
Article 22: Any civil servant who intentionally subtracts, deletes or steals acts and titles in his
possession or those given to him by virtue of his functions will be sanctioned in accordance with
article 185 of the Penal Code.
Article 23: Penalties of article 163 of the Penal Code will be applied to any one who unduly gets
access to information using false personal information as declarations, names or personality.
The same penalty applies to anyone who makes use of documents obtained in the conditions
described above or established a name other this his own
Any civil servant or employee who willfully provides documents or causes to be provided to
someone he/she knows should not have right to access shall be sanctioned by article 163 of the
Penal Code
Article 24: The civil servant or employee, who without justification, delays or refuses to respond
to information request or intentional provides false information as defined in article 155 of the
Penal Code to any user, will be sanctioned in accordance with articles 156 and 157 of the same
code.
Article 25: Anyone who demands for compensation or remuneration to provide a document of
information shall be sanctioned as prescribed in articles 186 and 187 of the Penal Code
8