Electronic and Postal Communications (Access, Co-location and Infrastructure sharing) G.N. No. 429 (contd) levy a charge for such co-location which will allow recovery of economic costs and ensure a reasonable rate of return. Nondiscrimination treatment Refusal of co-location 10.-(1) An infrastructure provider shall treat each(a) infrastructure acquirer on a basis that is nondiscriminatory in its provision of network facilities and no less favorable than the treatment which the infrastructure provider affords to its subsidiaries, its affiliates, or other similarly situated communications service providers; (b) communication network service of an infrastructure acquirer on a basis that is nondiscriminatory and no less favorable than the treatment which the infrastructure provider affords to the electronic communications network services of itself, its affiliates, or other similarly situated communications licensees; and (c) customer of an infrastructure acquirer on a basis that is non-discriminatory and no less favourable than the treatment which the infrastructure provider affords to its own customers of the customers of its subsidiaries, its affiliates, or other similarly situated communications licensees. 11.-(1) An infrastructure provider may refuse unreasonable requests for co-location or infrastructure sharing to its network facilities. (2) A request for co-location to network facilities shall be unreasonable if it(a) is not economically or technically feasible; (b) may result in the infrastructure provider being unduly prejudiced; (c) infrastructure sharing would endanger life or safety or irreparable damage property or threaten the integrity, security or interoperability of public 176